He isn’t “in favor of the purposeful killing of an infant.”
He’s “in favor of abortion being legal in the case of rape and incest, and the health and life of the mother.”
It is the correct and moral position.
If you are in favor of forcing by law a mother to bear the child of her rapist without her consent, then you are no better than her rapist.
Stop playing word games. No sane person is in favor of the purposeful killing of infants.
Only Obama and his ilk are in favor of that.
Romney's the one playing word games, by using the weasel-word "health of the mother." But no one should be surprised by this, since Romney has been pro-abort since he ran against Teddy.
“It is the correct and moral position”
So you think God would kill the child because of it’s father?
I guess he is insane then?
He’s “in favor of abortion being legal in the case of rape and incest, and the health and life of the mother.”
I find this a little confusing, don't you?
Sorry but that is the position of the political elite in both parties. Progressives must protect Gaia from the infestation of the intellectually inferior workers, and useless food gobblers.
As we learned way back in the 1960s, “health” means pro-abortion.
Health can mean anything, including the stress of being pregnant.
Romney has been pro-abortion for 49 straight years.
(CBS News) In an interview with CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley, Mitt Romney said his views on abortion rights are more lenient than those put forward in the Republican party platform.
Practicing forbearance in the murder of infants is not rape under any circumstances.
“If you are in favor of forcing by law a mother to bear the child of her rapist without her consent, then you are no better than her rapist. Stop playing word games. No sane person is in favor of the purposeful killing of infants.”
Chris, that is a harsh and deeply wrong judgment. Assuming you are sane, you are advocating the killing of a baby in these narrow circumstances, rape of the mom.
You need to face the moral choice you are making here—the baby’s life or the mom-to-be being forced to bear a rapist’s child. You can’t hide it behind buzzwords—choice, keep you hands off, etc. It’s a real moral decision that has to be made and its a really bad choice that no sane person would want to make. But occasionally it has to be made. Kill the baby or not?
You sound foolish when you call people “rapists” and “nazi’s” for saving the baby’s life.