Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: varyouga

We’re talking natural selection here, not genetic engineering, or invitro fertilization, or even nongenetic preferential selection. Anomolies tend to either adapt or disappear in a small timeframe. Until I see the first human asexually reproduce, it isn’t going to happen with the DNA we have.


47 posted on 08/29/2012 12:22:41 PM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: factoryrat
Genetic engineering IS now a part of our own natural selection. Just like tools, boats, mathematics, etc shaped the evolution of man in prehistory. For example, man was smart enough to tame fire for cooking which led to the massive expansion of our brains.

Yes, it does take two sets of human DNA to produce a unique offspring but those two humans need NOT be of the opposite sex when genetic engineering is used. In fact, the DNA of two males can be joined in a lab and produce a female egg. Female DNA can only result in female eggs.

Also, it IS possible for humans to reproduce 100% asexually with genetic engineering (aka cloning). Asexual meaning only one individual’s DNA is used. It is possible for a female to give birth to a copy of herself...

131 posted on 08/29/2012 3:05:11 PM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson