Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shortstop

The death of Neil Armstrong wasn’t ignored. The second he died, and for some time thereafter, this was the lead story on every newsbreak, on every tv screen news crawler, etc. I heard it, I saw it, it was dominant.

What happened is that people have gone on from there in a somewhat understated way, not like Kennedy, King, etc being assassinated. The circumstances of Armstrong’s death at 82, from heart disease, wasn’t shocking. He had lived as long as his body was able, so he passed from this life, and his enormous achievement was noted.

Beyond that, where would you go? Neil Armstrong was very understated and hated personal publicity. The man would not want anything more than what he received. He was PAINFULLy against anything more than that in life, and no doubt, in death.


9 posted on 08/28/2012 6:36:12 AM PDT by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: txrangerette
the second he died, and for some time thereafter, this was the lead story on every newsbreak ...
I was o/o the house Saturday evening, but at 8am Sunday I hopped between 6 or 7 news channels (Fox, CNN, HLN, cBS, etc.), and not one of them aired the story before the first commercial break.
Even my local Gannett rag had it buried on page 10.
The overt disrespect to one of America's greatest men was disgusting.
53 posted on 08/28/2012 8:39:05 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson