Replies

[ “a human is a spirit invested with a soul” / And, by definition, Science can acknowledge neither. ]

Like a monkey inspecting a ROLEX science cannot understand either the spirit or the soul... They are shiney mendations makes noises but what they are is a mystery.. And look more interesting in the sunlight than in darkness.. Science seems to like darkness..

By science I mean “scientists”.. After all what good is a ROLEX to a monkey?.. Maybe as entertainment..

[[Science seems to like darkness..]]

Aint that the truth- Awhile back I was looking into the claims of ‘evolution before our very eyes’ in regards to Eukoroytes and ? (can’t remember the other species at the moment- maybe it was prokaroytes- but it was claimed the one invaded the iother, and the host becAme so RELIANT O NTHE PRESENCE OF THE OTHER OVER TIME TRHAT the one was evolving into the other) and teachers and scientists KNEW the truth about the issue, but kept everyone, even the kids in schools, whom they were ‘teaching’ science to, in the dark abotu the actual truth- letting everyoen continue believing that the one species had invade another and ‘eventually evovled into the other and that it was ‘witnessed and recorded and evolution was happenign before our eyes-’-

However, when the TRUTH came to LIGHT- science books had to finally admit that it was nothign but a symbiotic relationship between the two species and not one species evolving into the other- It was a tough humble pie for them to eat- but they had to because they had invested so much into the cover-up because it was their ‘earliest examples’ of evolution which could ‘still be witnessed’ according to them- The LIGHT really bothered them quite a bit with the original authors vehemently denying what most of the rest of the scientific comunity was forced into admitting- (that and the ‘vestigial organs’ hypothesis which later proved innacurate too after light was shed o nthe subject despite the evolutionsits cocnerted efforts to keep peopel i nthe dark about hte truth)