Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ron C.

Apparently Ginsburg changed a word “shall” to “may” in the penalties for early states voting in the primaries. So now their delegates are not forced to be apportioned proportionally if they go early. They can now do a winner-take-all. So this guy is saying a large state like California can now move up its primary date, pay a penalty that wouldn’t mean much to a large state, and give the delegates winner-take-all. And this is what the Romney camp wanted.


98 posted on 08/27/2012 8:26:25 PM PDT by JediJones (Too Hot for GOP TV: Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Allen West and Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones
Thank you much for your replies, your thoughts and your zeal!

I'm of the opinion that the GOP has been hurt by these rule changes, and I know for certain that there has been quite a bit of outrage over this - outrage that will be expressed at the state level, straight at RNC leadership - likely for months to come.

It may be over for now - but I can guarantee that it is far from 'over.'

113 posted on 08/28/2012 7:21:30 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson