I have said nothing of your birth date on FR, so take your fire to the target. The way liberal trolls and issue trolls and “wannabe” competitive site pests pass through Jim’s house here, you can expect some hazing until you prove yourself.
To the point, there is STILL no one I know on FR, or personally, who is staying home, but plenty yet who may not vote the top of the ticket. You badgering and bullying about such a thing being a vote for Obama is a tired, desperate tactic that belittles the conscience and even the wisdom and reason of FReepers whose intellect exceeds yours and mine, who stand for something missing among most Americans, and who fall for nothing.
Romney is a fail in every way politically. If you want to “fall” for anything and stand for nothing, then good for you, but I need more time before falling, and may or may not.
LOL, brilliant, positively f'n brilliant. No vote for the Rep presidential candidate but a vote for a Rep. Senate or House candidate. Great move since this butthole in the WH doesn't CARE about the Senate or the House and simply goes around them issuing EO whenever he feels like it
"..you can expect some hazing until you prove yourself."
But you see it's not hazing. It is used against and others as PROOF we are wrong in what we say. It is an example of towering ignorance and stupidity to claim someone who just signed up here hasn't the experience or knowledge of anyone else here simply because he or she is a "N00B" Let me make it simpler so perhaps you can more easily "get it". Suppose FR had a section for Physicists and Albert Einstein were still alive. Further suppose he came across the site and decided to sign up. He then gets into a discussion with a long time member and gives his own opinions about say the theory of relativity or perhaps something about the law of photoelectric effect Let's say his positions are in conflict with the "old timer". The old timer then does as you suggest is appropriate and calls out our friend Al Einstein because he is a "N00B"
There can never be a circumstance in which a refutation of a position in any area is legitimate unless it is based on ONLY the content of the statement being criticized. Your position in this is indefensible.