I agree with Paul on some things, and I feel he goes a little overboard on others. I don't dislike the man at all, but it sounds like he's acting like a sore loser IF this story is anywhere near accurate. Would he rather have Oboma for 4 more years, or someone who's at least (if maybe not much) a move in the right direction?
Paul should humble himself, and think of the country first. Romney may not be his first choice, but another 4 years of Oboma should be completely out of the question - IF this article is true. (Remember, it's election season. The press is going to try to discourage people from voting Republican, so be careful about what you read. ALWAYS check the source first.)
.
“but it sounds like he’s acting like a sore loser”
Hardly. Paul has made it clear all along, in this election cycle and the last one, that he won’t endorse any R candidate who doesn’t even remotely support some fundamental constitutionalist positions.
Further, it appears to me that the Romney folks are doing a complete takeover of the party and making sure that real conservatives, constitutionalists and grass roots Tea Party folks are persona non grata at the convention and going forward. Refusing to seat duly elected national delegates simply confirms the Sovietization of the Republican party that many of us anticipated under Romney’s RNC.
In any event, I won’t be voting for Romney (nor Obama) regardless of Ron Paul’s endorsement or lack thereof. I will be happy to support conservatives (R or 2nd party) down the ticket. The GOP-e seems to be comprised of sociopaths and will not receive my votes ever.
BTW, we shouldn’t hold out too much hope that a R Congress will oppose much of what a Romney admin proposes, should we? They seem to barely be able to muster opposition the current WH occupant.
WRONG! Romney should have humbled himself and thought of USA first by stepping down OR not LIED about Newt his way through - he won nothing, he manipulated it like an athletic on steroids!