Posted on 08/25/2012 11:50:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
FUTA
Why not spell it out?
Now philman, it seems to me we recently had an election where the ‘out party’ used the phrase ‘it’s the economy stupid’. THEY WON
Fact; rats did cross over to vote for TA.
Fact; He’s part of a Party. He ran under their banner. Women ARE running from him. If Repubs lose any votes in , say Ohio, and R&R lose.....well Iguess we’ll be better off because TA stood on ‘principle’.
Last I looked Blacks can still vote. Put female stats on your post.
Fact; Hes part of a Party. He ran under their banner.
WOW! I did not know that. I had no idea whatsoever what that (R) behind his name meant. /extreme sarcasm
Last I looked Blacks can still vote.
Yep, they can still votes. And as the poll shows they overwhelmingly trend Democrat.
Put female stats on your post.
I can't edit posts already on the boards.
And don't tell me what to do. If the female stats are so important to you then you put up the female stats.
You can do that, can't you?
LOL -show me.... a good Missouri saying.
I’ll take Rush and FLee Levin words.
Check county figures in ‘Post-Dispatch’
Female stats aren’t any more important to me than Black stats are apparently to you.
They are what they are.
It’s the TOTALS that will matter. I know in your heart you know I’m right ;-)
LOL -show me.... a good Missouri saying.
I’ll take Rush and FLee Levin words.
Check county figures in ‘Post-Dispatch’
Female stats aren’t any more important to me than Black stats are apparently to you.
They are what they are.
It’s the TOTALS that will matter. I know in your heart you know I’m right ;-)
oops! looked so nice i hit it twice
If the GOP-e wants to keep a place in the Republican party they'll have to start showing some brand name discipline or they'll lose everything ~ the party, the important factions, all the voters, the candidates.
12 losers in the last 70 years is 12 too many! We've only had 6 winners in that time under their authority! Then there's the 'me to ism' ~ just too much of that ~ gives the show away to the Democrats. Romney has already started to speak well of RombamakKKare ~ and that is certainly only the first of a wave of 'me to ism's. Democrats love that stuff ~ they know they can run a stuffed dog for office and beat a Republican who does that.
Ann Wagner would be a good replacement but she is set where she is. She is a lock-in for his old Congressional District, a sure thing that she will win without a fight. She would not trade that for this and I don't think anyone could blame her.
I have listened to discussions about viable replacement candidates and it is hard to come up with one especially at this late date.
I know in your heart you know I'm right in that the end hasn't arrived yet.
See, two can play that game.
Surely you can "figure it out", can't you?
You keep positing it and I'll keep asking it.
And what do you think about the comments by McCaskill in the article I pinged you to last night from Aug 8, 2012 well before all of this started?
Doesn't it sound to you like she intended to damage him instead of help him?
Wagner can do a switcheroo with Akin and get on the ballot for Senator, and Akin get his old Congressional seat, but that takes Akin’s approval. I think he is a dead-ender and will not change his mind, though I hope he will.
I have to laugh at some of the people here who say they will “support” Akin. The only support Akin cares about is $$$, because all of the national PACs and Republican Committes have stopped spending anything on the race. The only exception is HuckPac, but I am not sure that is going to help very much.
It amazes me that so many here are still talking theory. Philosophy. It matters little. Akin is the candidate. Until HE and only HE petitions the court to have his name removed from the ballot. Even then, it is not a done deal...
Akin will be giving ANOTHER apology-news-er soon — indicative that he is done for.
Everyone seems to know it but him.
When one has more Dem support than Indy and Pubbie combined, one should read the handwriting on the wall.
If Akin hangs on, Washington welcomes the return of Senator McCaskill.
Akin needs to face up to his ‘macaca’ moment. He stepped in it. Once that happened, he can’t unstep out of it.
A write-in candidate would only split the vote, allowing Claire McCaskill to cruise to another term. I can't think of a write-in candidate who would have enough appeal to win over the Akin supporters--and there are apparently a lot of them--who believe their candidate is getting a bum rap and resent the meddling by outsiders such as Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin and the GOP establishment.
The best thing to do is to call off the pile-on, accept Akin's apology and get behind him.
Eagle Forum also continues to back him.
no, it doesn’t sound like mccaskill intended to damage him. she intended to damage the republican voting strength by keeping a strong conservative out of the race.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.