Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Son House
he claimed to have read something a long time ago that lead to his elaboration.

The fact that what he read was true, based on a history of evidence, doesn't matter to you ?

COME ON. YOU KNOW women have claimed RAPE after having consensual sex, Or after they became pregnant. This whole issue is about the use of the word LEGITIMATE, because it implies women would LIE. THAT, is the unspoken reality of this. THAT WORD is what is being objected to. Not whether women who are raped can or cannot get pregnant, but on WHETHER WOMEN LIE to COVER UP the reason for a PREGNANCY, and whether they would CRY RAPE so that they can get the government(meaning YOU and ME) to pay for their ABORTION.

102 posted on 08/25/2012 10:15:37 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (RED NECK KUNG FU by Corn Fuschas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2

The fact that he couldn’t accurately repeat or source exactly what he said is his problem.

Allow me a similar example, guy says Bush changed the bank law so banks could have less then 25% in reserve. At that point, I didn’t know it was probably the Securities Exchange Commission in 2004 that changed the amount of reserve that Investment banks could have that he was talking about, so I couldn’t correct or counter the misinformation this individual has believed and/or was spouting. The point being, he thought and talked as if he was an authority on the subject.

Same logic, only in this example I bet he’s wrong and either is misinformed or has an agenda. Can I accept the next thing this guy says as fact? No.


124 posted on 08/25/2012 10:43:06 AM PDT by Son House (The Economic Boom Heard Around The World => TEA Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2
Your argument is invalid because your position depends on using pregnancy as a litmus test as to whether rape actually occurred. Problem is, there is often corroborating evidence that points to a sexual assault in these instances.

In such a case, you apparently would have predetermined that it wasn't a rape after all. That'll never sell to the non-Taliban crowd.

153 posted on 08/25/2012 11:10:21 AM PDT by Post Toasties (Leftists give insanity a bad name. 0bama: Four years of failure and fingerpointing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2

> This whole issue is about the use of the word LEGITIMATE, because it implies women would LIE. THAT, is the unspoken reality of this. THAT WORD is what is being objected to. Not whether women who are raped can or cannot get pregnant, but on WHETHER WOMEN LIE to COVER UP the reason for a PREGNANCY, and whether they would CRY RAPE so that they can get the government(meaning YOU and ME) to pay for their ABORTION.

hey pal! the word “legitimate” isn’t the half of it. Akin claimed that pregnancies from — I don’t care what you call it, “legitimate rape”, “real rape”, “forcible rape”, “rape rape” was REALLY RARE, claiming some GodAwful fact-free quacks had determined that female bodies had ways to “shut it down”. This is IDIOCY, and extremely insulting to rape victims.


160 posted on 08/25/2012 11:16:59 AM PDT by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender! REMEMBER NEDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson