To: Loyalist
The woman was on the verge of getting married "within days," police said. They would not confirm, however, whether the wedding was to be held Saturday. Seriously, this reporter needs to go back to Journo school.I hate it when a wedding is held with a wet, dead bride.
2 posted on
08/25/2012 5:45:31 AM PDT by
COUNTrecount
(On November 6, 2012 "I Built It'...Obama's defeat)
To: COUNTrecount
Seriously, this reporter needs to go back to Journo school.I hate it when a wedding is held with a wet, dead bride. Perhaps the story was originally filed in French.Sometimes,what sounds fine in one language doesn't survive translation intact.
4 posted on
08/25/2012 5:49:54 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(The Word Is Out,Harry Reid's Into Child Porn.Release All Your Photos,Harry!)
To: COUNTrecount
Didn’t read article. Did he comment on whether the groom gets to keep the wedding gifts already received? How about a refund of the deposit on the Reception local or at least a 50% refund since half the main attraction is still alive.
Just askin’ is all.
To: COUNTrecount
Reading comprehension.
The article merely mentioned that it was unconfirmed that the wedding had been originally scheduled for Saturday.
Before the accident.
Moron alert...
13 posted on
08/25/2012 6:29:44 AM PDT by
wolficatZ
("We are no longer accepting comments on this article")
To: COUNTrecount
Pay attention to the grammar:
“Was to be held” is different than “will be held”
23 posted on
08/25/2012 7:00:28 AM PDT by
Fido969
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson