Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mkjessup

No, I wasn’t including 1984. We only have Obama because the GOP nominee standards have been so low for so long that someone like McCain could get the nomination. Romney will just continue the eradication of our founding principles. I still want Romney to win but only by a small margine.


86 posted on 08/25/2012 11:33:47 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: freedomfiter2
No, I wasn’t including 1984. We only have Obama because the GOP nominee standards have been so low for so long that someone like McCain could get the nomination. Romney will just continue the eradication of our founding principles. I still want Romney to win but only by a small margin.

Our views are not that much different. I do think that after 4 years of 0bama that America has been innoculated to the excessive and insidious expansion of federal power and if Romney wants to be re-elected in 2016, he must tilt to starboard (to the right), and conservatives both on the street and those who will be elected to office both this year and in 2014 will be watching Romney very closely and I do not believe that Vice President Paul Ryan is going remain silent if he observes traditional (or even non-traditional) liberal behavior coming out of President Romney. As long as we can get that lyin' jug-eared SOB out of the White House, we've got a shot at turning things around.
88 posted on 08/25/2012 1:38:05 PM PDT by mkjessup (Finley Peter Dunne - "Politics ain't beanbag")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson