[mkjessup]

You really need to put down that crack pipe. There is no way in Hell that Romney is as bad as 0bama.
You’re right. He’s only half as much of a big government kind of guy. It would have taken him twice as long to accomplish what Obama did.

The most important task before us is to defeat 0bama. Only a fool, an idiot or a stealth-0bama supporter would argue otherwise. Do I like Romney? Hell NO I don't like him! But as our esteemed Founder stated last week, we'll deal with the RINOs later, for now we have to get that Marxist out of the White House.

Roll back your calendar to a hypothetical day in say, 1964 and let us presume that instead of Barry Goldwater, the GOP had nominated Nelson Rockefeller. And just to make the contrast a bit more chilling, let us say that the 'Rat candidate that year was not LBJ but someone like Eugene McCarthy, who would you vote for?

Ponder that. As Donald Rumsfeld said "you got to war with the army (or the candidate) you got, not the army you wish you had".

[freedomfiter2]

There is no doubt that Romney is better than Obama and one of the two will be elected. The problem is that ever since 1984 we have always had to choose between two new world order candidates. At some point we have to break the cycle and with Romney, we’ll have to wait 8 more years to even get another chance.

The other issue is that Congressional Republicans can be counted on to oppose a Democrat President at least some of the time. Most GOP Congressmen will not oppose a GOP President. The cumulative effect is that more damage is done by moderate Republican Presidents.