[muawiyah]

Akin should have frequently and loudly rejected McCaskill's help. But he didn't.

He's like Romney after his agents in Virginia manage to spoil the primary ~ he kept silent. He's still silent.

When good men refuse to speak out against bad acts that means ~ what?

It means they aren't as good as you want them to be.

I have suggested dumping both of these guys for the same reasons.

And neither have their broad spectrum Conservative credentials in line ~ just an ACU rating (where applicable).

Supporting Akin is tarnishing your own conservative credentials.

[philman_36]

Supporting Akin is tarnishing your own conservative credentials.
I don't give a rat's )@( what you or anyone else thinks about my "conservative credentials".
I haven't cared about that petty BS on my stance on the WOsD, on my stance with the Roberts decision or on my stance about eligibility.

I'm not here to be "popular" nor do I "move with the herd" as you damn well know. I think for myself and if that's considered a detriment by others then I count it as an asset simply because it causes such seeming consternation.

[philman_36]

Akin should have frequently and loudly rejected McCaskill's help.
So how do you think she would have responded if he had asked her to stop her "help" as you put it?