mlizzy,
He has alienated hundreds of thousands of women who were GOING to vote for him. They don’t want McCaskill, but now they can’t vote for Akin, so they most likely won’t vote for the senate seat at all and that is the shame.
He has alienated hundreds of thousands of women who were GOING to vote for him. They don’t want McCaskill, but now they can’t vote for Akin, so they most likely won’t vote for the senate seat at all and that is the shame.Any woman that is offended by a man that sticks up for life and women, is a progressive type lady, not a true conservative. And where do you get your figures of hundreds of thousands?
Hundreds of thousands of female voters that where going to vote for him now will not? That seems excessive to me, after all there are only about 4 million REGISTERRED voters in MO. Of those fifty percent DON”T VOTE making around 2 million ACTIVE voters. Of those we can assume that at least 1/2 are women making around 1 million ACTIVE Women voters in MO.
Maybe, just maybe, you should dial back the hyperbole just a bit!
A college professor once wrote on the chalk board for us to consider in class Never assume anything it only makes an ass/of u/ and/me Ass/u/me . If there were a whole lot of women who were going to vote for him but now cannot— WHY not.He made a stupid comment and has apologized several times for it. IF the incumbent now wins we ought not blame Akin but the “progressives” who have beguiled us into believing the LIE
fostered by the evil woman Margaret Sanger back when she introduced the bloody show as a means of ridding us of what she called “human weeds” unfit for her social circle.