To: philman_36
Rassmussen stands out for not having skewed weighting, and its state by state Obama/Romney polls have generally been much more favorable to Romney than others.
To: Strategerist
If you're getting to the point where you have to challenge Rassmussen for being biased, you've already lost the argument and are desperately clutching at straws.
At this point, I'm going to assume anyone that is still left here supporting Akin is a McCaskill supporter gone incognito.....or some sort of hardcore masochist.
Supporting this guy only results in a McCaskill win, intense pressure needs to be brought on him to quit, and quit soon, hopefully before the Democrat Convention.
289 posted on
08/23/2012 9:40:23 AM PDT by
PhxTM06
(")
To: Strategerist
Rassmussen stands out for not having skewed weighting, and its state by state Obama/Romney polls have generally been much more favorable to Romney than others.Good for them. Judging by your "skewed" comment though you're at least willing to admit that there
is weighting going on to
some extent.
I'd still like to see the numbers as they freely admit they weight/sample their polls.
Doesn't such information interest you in light of recent discoveries concerning that issue?
328 posted on
08/23/2012 10:56:55 AM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson