To: so_real
There is real irony in your position. You, as are most of us, are solidly pro-life. In your heart you think Akin can still win, but if you have a logical brain you know he cannot. There are other pro-life Republicans who could take his place and win. So the irony is that our side has pro-life candidates who could get rid of pro-abortion McCaskill, but you stubbornly dig in your heels for the only pro-life candidate who cannot win. So the pro-abort stays in office. And more innocent babies die, which is the very thing you oppose. For some reason, you cannot seem to understand or accept what is true.
You may think it is unfair, but some here may make the conclusion that you are working for McCasKILL. Can you blame them?
281 posted on
08/23/2012 9:31:10 AM PDT by
doug from upland
(Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
To: doug from upland
You may think it is unfair, but some here may make the conclusion that you are working for McCasKILL. Can you blame them?
Yes, I can. That conclusion is nearly as idiotic as the claim some have made that Akin was bought and paid for by the Democrats so as to produce a voting record like the one that defines his exemplary political career. It's ludicrous and I do wish for more than knee jerk analysis from those on FR.
327 posted on
08/23/2012 10:56:16 AM PDT by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson