To: Repeat Offender
And for those of you waiting to tell me how a non-vote for Romney is a vote for 0bama - save it 0+1 does not = 2.
That's the equivalent of screaming "Racist!". It just means they have no valid argument.
BTW I've noticed that all the "brave" conservative talkers who rushed to trash Aikin are strangely silent on Brown.
35 posted on
08/22/2012 3:37:52 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: cripplecreek
BTW I've noticed that all the "brave" conservative talkers who rushed to trash Aikin are strangely silent on Brown. No, no, no Brown is in Massachusetts, so it's okay to have flexible morals.....Aikin on the other hand is a blight on the all of humanity. /s
The GOP is like a big gust of headwind when you're standing outside taking a leak.
36 posted on
08/22/2012 3:44:14 PM PDT by
Repeat Offender
(While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded.)
To: cripplecreek
BTW I've noticed that all the "brave" conservative talkers who rushed to trash Aikin are strangely silent on Brown. Thot Aikin is Karl Rove's boy (to the tune of $millions), whereas Steelman, who lost the primary, is a Tea Party person.
I'm not to the bottom of it yet (so to speak), but I think internal Missouri divisions are behind some of that.
Not sure what Aikin was trying to accomplish when he popped off, but he sure didn't have his ducks in a row, when he brought up a MAJOR 'Rat theme and message to barren women (who contribute heavily to the DNCCC and are Wasserman-Schultz fangirls) and tried to walk through a fresh thought. He didn't have his position prepped, IMHO, and tried to wing it on the spur of the moment -- and fell flat.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson