This is why Akin needs to go. Every Republican down to the candidate for dog catcher is going to be asked this question.
F’in idiots.
Best response: ‘I disagree with Rep. Aken in his unfortunate use of words. Yet, the idea that a baby is responsible and should pay the ultimate price of a death penalty for the actions of an assailant who happens to be his biological father is wrong.
I believe that a woman who has been raped should be treated with respect, love and helped to bring the child to term and adoption. The idea that the trauma of rape is blunted by the further trauma of an abortion is not rational in my eyes’
Now any more questions regarding what a candidate in Missouri said to a local reporter, or whatever, should be laughed at and called what they are - a deflection by a failed party promoting failed policies propping up a failed ideology.
So Ryan didn’t get any of those really hardball questions like “Red or Green?” that Barry gets. Well, we already know Barry is a moron and probably couldn’t handle the questions like Romney and Ryan are getting so it really doesn’t matter. If one of the clowns in the “media” dares to throw Barry a fastball they know they’ll pay for it.
TURN THE TABLES on the Pro-Aborts!
The “Rape & Incest exception” argument has been a Fraud and a Red Herring for over 40 years.
DO NOT answer that question!
Instead, say:
“This argument has been a Fraud and a Red Herring for over 40 years!”
“Bring me the legislation containing this exception, and THEN we can begin to talk.”
“NOBODY, has EVER brought forth legislation with this language, yet it is used to beat up Pro-Lifers at every turn!”
“ Would YOU support such restrictions on abortion?”
You can go on to say, you would sign such legislation, because it is a starting point that would save over 1 Million lives a year.
Rape is rape, now let’s discuss 0bama’s failures. That is the correct answer every Republican needs to reply.
I have heard conservative (supposedly)freepers urging that this (staunch) conservative be tossed under the bus because he is “incoherent”—unable to express himself, and he has a tail, and so forth and so on.
Here he is eloquently defending himself, after having been thrown to Matt Liar and the MSM wolves by the GOP elite and their pick, Mitt Romney:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp=48749183�;
Akin explains that the people of Missouri selected him, that he misspoke (no one here ever has a bad day) and apologized (ditto), and still the GOP-e and many FRiends—in the spirit of Obama’s sense of “Because I/We-Say-So” federalism—believes their judgment trumps that of the citizens of the great state of Missouri.
To hell with Romney and the GOP elite masters-of-men.
He’s being marginalized just like Akin.
Aikin is political herpes.
LLS
I know it is easy to put the focus on the victim of rape. Any woman subjected to such inhuman savagery is one who needs all the support she can get. However, when a human being is conceived from such an act, there are two lives that need society’s support: the mother and her child. To stigmatize the child because of its odious origin is like hanging a woman for being a witch. It is a mass hysteria which creates a victim in the unborn child. It is time this kind of superstition stops.
Here we go again-the media and the Democrats framing the discussion.
VA Ping!
If you want on/off the VA Ping List, please freepmail me. Thanks!
In the future when he is asked by a reporter about abortion in the case of rape, Ryan should say that a child conceived from such a rape no more deserves to be killed than the reporter’s mother needs to be killed for giving birth to such a Zero-media buttboy.
Here is the answer he could give, “Forcible rape is the term used by the FBI in its Uniform Crime Report regarding 4 violent crimes. We had thought to distinguish between rape as it is properly understood and statutory rape involving underage females who consented to sex. Though such sex is defined as statutory rape because there is an issue of consent we wanted to exclude this class of sexual crime from the law” Unfortunately this distinction lead people to believe we were also excluding forms of non consensual sex where force was not used, this was never our intent and the subsequent bill dropped that distinction.”