Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joe fonebone

It’s pretty simple:

The ACA was NOT written as a TAX, and in fact was clearly presented as NOT a tax. If it WAS written as a TAX, the bill wouldn NOT have passed.

So, the dishonorable Justice Roberts took it upon himself to RE-WRITE the ACA and call it a TAX.

As you may remember from elementary school, it is the Legislative Branch of government that is charged with writing law, not the Judicial Branch.

Therefore, what he did was clearly unconstitutional.


45 posted on 08/22/2012 8:56:25 AM PDT by privatedrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: privatedrive
"Therefore, what he did was clearly unconstitutional."

And it is the law. Perfectly compatible with the Democrat approach - the law is what we say it is when we say it.

46 posted on 08/22/2012 9:02:17 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

See post #43..

It was written as a tax..

Just because fubo said it is not a tax does not make that so...

Roberts did not change a thing..

fubo lied (what a surprise)


47 posted on 08/22/2012 9:08:36 AM PDT by joe fonebone (I am the 15%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson