So, do you think their solution of running a write-in campaign is a winner?
Akin is a Christian conservative pro-lifer. He’s just the kind that cinos have been saying is what they want to hold Romney’s feet to the fire.
In their haste to injure their own candidate, rather than simply say “We think Rep Akin has misspoken and we ask him to rephrase or repudiate what he was trying to say.”, they have been the major force attacking him.
That was all they needed. Easy. There is such a thing as a “fake” rape, and there is such a thing as “other than violent” rape. Additionally, there is a significant percentage of women impregnated by rape, but there is validity to the notion that willing partners are more likely to see pregnancy result from their union.
This is not from me...this is from a physician supporter of Mitt Romney who has written on the subject.
Going into all the minutiae about pregnancy rates and uh, "whether the woman really wanted sex or not" is a loser's argument that's going to get stuck far up inside the person making it. At the end game, with all due respect, the scoreboard will bear testimony to the stupidity and arrogance of it.
I dunno. I’m thiniking Akin needs to go. Yes, I know he’s “on our side,” but if nothing else, he’s apparently too unwilling to think before he speaks to be worthy of a Senate seat. That’s a problem with our politicians in general - do we need to compound the error even further?
Keep digging...
So when the creepy Uncle brings a 14 year old girl to take care of the ‘situation’ it’s important to know it wasn’t really rape because there’s a baby... I mean a situation that shows she really wanted it.
Idiots.