[golas1964]

No, we ALL need to read it right now, and be ready to respond at the grass roots level, this Labor Day weekend at family gatherings, or any other time the liberals in our respective families are first to bring up the issue, from now until November 6th:

If the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (Kennedy v. Louisiana - 2008 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_v._Louisiana ) that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment for rapists, why then is the death penalty acceptable for the innocent unborn child? It’s not the baby’s fault.

http://www.rebeccakiessling.com/index.html

[Just mythoughts]

No, we ALL need to read it right now, and be ready to respond at the grass roots level, this Labor Day weekend at family gatherings, or any other time the liberals in our respective families are first to bring up the issue, from now until November 6th: If the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (Kennedy v. Louisiana - 2008 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_v._Louisiana ) that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment for rapists, why then is the death penalty acceptable for the innocent unborn child? It’s not the baby’s fault. http://www.rebeccakiessling.com/index.html

We would not be required to play in the devil's sandbox if Akin had cited this 'supreme' court ruling.

I am reminded of Jesus warning of those that sit in Moses' seat. That most assuredly has come to pass.

AND IF anybody has his ear, tell him IF he intends to recover his credibility to start now citing this case. The JonStewart media will NOT touch this case with one second of air time. Akin needs to be told 'communication' is not his strong suit.

AND Akin needs to find himself a 'Christian' lawyer to write his words so he can stop putting his foot in his mouth.