You are wrong in the eyes of so many people that I have absolutely NO DOUBT that you are also wrong in God’s eyes.
A lot of children will die because of your wrong. Your candidate (who you support) has done enough damage to the pro-life movement to actually increase (not decrease)the number of unborn children not to be born.
Janet Reno also claimed she had good intentions to save the children in Waco even after she burnt them all up. She figured, if SHE cannot save the lives of the children HER WAY than nobody should have those kids.
Even those republicans, democrats and independents who feel abortion is not a good thing but it’s not at the top of their list of issues see that Akin and his blind supporters have hurt the pro-life movement so much that it will likely destroy more children than it will save see this.
“... I have absolutely NO DOUBT that you are also wrong in God’s eyes.”
Wow, imagine that, ***St tsowellfan***.
You, ON BEHALF OF GOD HIMSELF, have me charged, tried, convicted and awaiting sentence.
SPEAKING FOR GOD. That’s beyond presumptive, I’m guessing. It might even be *blasphemy*; I’ll have to ask someone much more qualified than I, on that subject.
Those heavenly wings and that glowing halo you’re wearing must be very weighty, but I’m sure that you carry them very well.
“A lot of children will die because of your wrong.”
Don’t you dare to dump that crap line on me, pal! I committed no wrong regarding the Akin controversy, last time I checked. I merely said that people like you and so many others shouldn’t throw the man under a bus for making a mistake, correcting himself and apologizing. He is NOT “my candidate”; let’s get that straight, as well. I first heard of him on Monday (8/20) afternoon, the day after he gave the interview.
WHAT ***WRONG*** ARE YOU REFERRING TO, PLEASE? Can you rationally, rather than emotionally, answer that?
And your claiming to speak for God is probably not a good idea, those wings & halo notwithstanding. You and He will have that conversation, someday.
“Janet Reno” and “Waco”? Now you’re changing the subject and diverting the conversation, like Alinsky or a true liberal would do.
Please try to focus on the subject, at hand: Akin and his stupid statement - based on a long-since-discredited 70s theory from a dentist - and why he should/shouldn’t be forgiven for that grievous mistake, after correcting himself and apologizing.
See you around, ***St tsowellfan***.
(Your halo needs a recharge; better plug it in tonite...)