Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kartographer

“My over all thought on this is that if they were stupid enough to sell these guns back through such a program they are to stupid handle the responsibility of owning a gun.”

Mere ignorance of a gun’s value is not stupidity.

Taking advantage of said ignorance is arguably an immoral act. If the financial loss is knowingly inflicted upon a poor person who needed the money, such a taking may correctly dubbed an ‘evil’ act as it is done with full knowledge of the cheating of the ignorant.

Nathaniel Grigsby correctly called the Democrats the Party of Treason for a reason. Knowingly defrauding a poor and ignorant person in order to restrict that poor and/or ignorant person of their First Amendment rights ia, arguably, treason.

Doing so under color of law is, IIRC, arguably a Federal felony.

But, since when was


18 posted on 08/21/2012 7:05:31 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: GladesGuru
I stand by my statement someone so easily hoodwinked or so ready and anxious to give up their right and means of protection so easily they have at least in my mind demonstrated they have not the capacity required to be a responsible gun owner.
29 posted on 08/21/2012 8:15:13 AM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson