Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
I think what he might have meant to do is distinguish statutory rape and violent rape (which he called “legitimate” to distinguish it from statutory where there is consent).

That is my take, but when given the opportunity to explain it that way on Hannity, he just muddied the waters even more.

He believes abortion should be illegal in any and all circumstances, which is an honorable view shared by many conservatives. Why didn't he just say that and leave it there? Instead he started splitting hairs and making ignorant junk science claims.

32 posted on 08/20/2012 7:20:19 PM PDT by randita (Paul Ryan is "Mr. Smith goes to Washington.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: randita

I can’t believe he again blew it when Hannity gave him a chance to explain it. His thinking was just not clear. Is no one on his campaign able to prepare him?


36 posted on 08/20/2012 7:30:06 PM PDT by doug from upland (Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson