Skip to comments.
Secret files shed new light on Dieppe
The Vancouver Sun ^
| 18th August 2012
| Doug Schmidt
Posted on 08/20/2012 10:28:10 AM PDT by the scotsman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: the scotsman; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...

Canada Ping!
2
posted on
08/20/2012 10:31:03 AM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Tories in- now the REAL work begins!)
To: the scotsman
3
posted on
08/20/2012 10:39:36 AM PDT
by
Berlin_Freeper
(Siri says: Romney never met a homosexual he didn't like.)
To: the scotsman
To: the scotsman
Certainly a new take on the Dieppe raid. Bottom line German e-boats, patrolling the English Channel, detected the attack flotilla and alerted the German coastal defenses. To make matters worse the attack was delayed by an hour giving the Germans even more time to prepare. The initial troops didn't start their assault until 8AM, by then they were assaulting a beach that was totally covered by interlocking fire. This was the WWII version of the ‘Charge of the Light Brigade’.
5
posted on
08/20/2012 10:52:07 AM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: BluH2o
Nobody can organize military disasters as well as do the Brits.
6
posted on
08/20/2012 11:02:35 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: BenLurkin
To: the scotsman
Yes, 300 ships and 6000 Soldiers is the best way to sneak in and grab a code machine.
8
posted on
08/20/2012 11:07:55 AM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: the scotsman
This was posted a few days ago...with a YouTube link. When I followed the YT link, it also led to a ret’d general’s discussion & slideshow of the Russian-German portion of WW2.
Frankly, the casualties and expenditure of war effort of all but the very largest US-Cana-UK allies were almost nothing compared to the tribulations of the Russian-German conflict. I only bring this up as a point of reference, not to denigrate any country’s contribution.
The Russians lost the entire casualty count of the US in a good number of 1-2-3-10 day battles-—about 35-40 times.
9
posted on
08/20/2012 11:11:18 AM PDT
by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(This stuff we're going through now, this is nothing compared to the middle ages.)
To: the scotsman; zot
Dieppe - I’m not convenced that the raid was solely to acquire the German codes based upon this article; but having it as one of several reasons for the mission does make sense. I think the need to draw German forces from the Eastern Front is the major reason.
10
posted on
08/20/2012 11:14:01 AM PDT
by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: BenLurkin
Nobody can organize military disasters as well as do the Brits.
Err... Jimmy Carter?
11
posted on
08/20/2012 11:15:47 AM PDT
by
Labour-Watch
(www.labour-watch.com)
To: BluH2o
The initial troops didn't start their assault until 8AM, I stand corrected, after referencing a book on Dieppe written by a Canadian infantry captain who was on the main beach at Dieppe during the attack. Although delayed the initial attack was earlier, by 8AM most of the fighting was over.
12
posted on
08/20/2012 11:18:10 AM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: GreyFriar
I don’t know what the real purpose was, but in order to draw German forces from their Eastern Front, the Dieppe raid would have had to establish a perimeter and hold it for some considerable time.
13
posted on
08/20/2012 11:31:03 AM PDT
by
zot
To: BluH2o
by then they were assaulting a beach that was totally covered by interlocking fire.
How is that any different than Omaha Beach, Iwo Jima, Tarawa, etc?
14
posted on
08/20/2012 11:33:59 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
In the battle of Smolensk in early July, 1941 the German Army captured some 600,000 Russians in a three-day period.
15
posted on
08/20/2012 11:34:59 AM PDT
by
jmacusa
(Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
That happens when soldiers are considered expendable. Half the Russian machine guns were pointed at their own soldiers.
16
posted on
08/20/2012 11:42:26 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
To: the scotsman
17
posted on
08/20/2012 11:43:33 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: GreyFriar
From what I have read....The Nazi war machine, was all over Europe, and no one was capable of opposing, the media continued to report the advances of the Nazi hoard....and so Churchill and others, needed to redirect the media....hence the attacking force, was thrown together; with a logical result....I haven’t read: did they secure the code machine?
18
posted on
08/20/2012 11:57:34 AM PDT
by
B212
To: zot
In keeping alive or creating the threat of an invasion/future invasion as a possibility would have caused the diversion of some troops. The key thing was showing Stalin that the western allies were doing something...whether or not Stalin would have thought it as ‘enough’ is hard to know for sure.
19
posted on
08/20/2012 12:09:19 PM PDT
by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: BenLurkin
“Nobody can organize military disasters as well as do the Brits.”
Don’t be so modest. The Dieppe raid doesn’t even compare to the magnitude of Pearl Harbour or Vietnam.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson