The mainstream media have gleefully pulled the "RAPE" card. We conservatives should recognize this for what this is: There is no real issue, no real "outrage" over what Akin said. In fact, what Akin said is generally true, albeit inartfully said.
This is amazing! Folks are demanding that an adamantly pro-life nominee should withdraw.Thank you both for your commentary and thread. The left doesn't have to publicly dismiss Akin, because the right is doing all the work for them. It's a tragedy, but I believe Akin's comment was no "coincidence." All who believe in Christ, know that rarely is so. Because now Romney jumped on the bandwagon re-outing NOT ONLY himself but evidently converting Ryan (who was 100% pro-life) as a baby-killer too (in cases of rape). Monstrous!!!! Pray the Republican Convention rocks out a true pro-life conservative, cancelling the Mitt pick. And pray Paul runs for the hills. He doesn't belong with Romney.
Thank you back.
I really hate to see this kind of thing happen. I believe that Akin was merely explaining in his own imperfect way that he does not believe in exceptions when it comes to our duty to protect life. If I lived in Missouri, he’d certainly get my vote.