Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
The Defense would first have to prove that the pregnancy came from the rape and that it was not part of the 5% exception.

I'll make it easy for you - the prosecution and the victim state that the pregnancy was a result of the alleged rape. So there's nothing for the defense to "prove."

I have no idea what you mean by the 5% "exception." If you truly believe what you're typing, you'll be going into that jury room and say "I have reasonable doubt that this was an actual rape - since the alleged victim is pregnant, that means there's a good chance she's lying - does anyone else agree?"

105 posted on 08/20/2012 9:10:15 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist
I'll make it easy for you - the prosecution and the victim state that the pregnancy was a result of the alleged rape.

And they would state that why???

115 posted on 08/20/2012 9:20:45 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson