We had four years of an openly opposed Obama and he just flipped congress and the people the bird and did what he wanted via executive orders and czars.
What will be worse is an Obama who doesn't have another election to run on. An Obama who knows he has four more years to enact the 'change' he wants and no more. An Obama turbocharged with the thought that he has a 'mandate' and people want his 'fundamental transformation'. An Obama who can stack the courts for a lifetime of ongoing change after he leaves office. (Supreme court justice Holder sounds nice doesn't it?) How about four years of Democrats knowing they won?
At least Mitt, with all his faults, will have to pander for his next election. He isn't an activist, just a RINO politician who cares about votes and money. In a perfect world, we wouldn't have to consider him, but it isn't perfect, we are up against a Marxist Activist. With that option, I'll take the surliest punk I can because that punk will be willing to 'soil his morals' and play dirty to stop him.
I will be voting Constitution party...
Rationally speaking, it is mathematically impossible for Goode to win, period. He isn't qualified on enough ballots to reach the 271 margin. The way electors are divvied out though, it is better to just not vote. Plus, why is Goode any better, he has a few years of pandering to the Right, but he is a former Dem who frankly, isn't much better than Mitt except he is bad at math.
With Willard, we may implode anyway...
Roll of the dice.
Why is Goode any better....he is a former Dem who frankly, isn’t much better than Mitt except he is bad at math.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Amen and thank you.
We have NOT had 4 years of an opposed Obama. The first two years of his presidency he was supported by a Dem Senate and a Dem House. It is only AFTER the elections in 2010 did the GOP take the House. The Senate still remains in DEM hands.