Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney says Ryan won't oppose abortion in rape cases (Romney supports both rape & incest abortion)
JS Online ^ | Aug. 20, 2012 | James Rowen

Posted on 08/20/2012 5:17:54 AM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-291 next last
To: sam_paine

“The President’s “view” on abortion have no EFFECT on the number of abortions.”

Okay.

“However, Obama’s views on infanticide and his support of NOW and Planned Parenthood...”

Huh?!? You just said it doesn’t matter what the President believes about abortion, since there is no correlation. So, by your logic, it doesn’t matter what Obama believes about abortion, or what he supports.


161 posted on 08/20/2012 12:59:34 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Ok so A) they oppose abortion because it is the taking of innocent human life, but B) it’s ok to take innocent human life depending on the manner of conception.

Real consistency there.


162 posted on 08/20/2012 1:03:46 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Well, first, I’d say that its a pretty callused statement to say that a woman who, when raped and who says I dont want to have a baby that happened as the result of rape “well, fine, but you are a murderer”. Really? A murderer? I also dont know that you can state for certain what will happen to the girl in all cases, such as “she will have a guilty conscience for the rest of her life”. You said letting the baby develop is a default inactive choice. But you are ignoring that what got her in that position was ALSO an inactive choice. So saying sorry, but because of an inactive choice some monster made, you have to live with it because of another inactive choice that we who know better are going to make for you, just doesn’t sit right with me.

Second, its really easy to argue from the standpoint that you seem to want to argue from, the position of black and white, all about the baby. But you dont seem to want to touch the issue of what about her and the practical details of her life and her rights. Thats the part where this stance always falls down to me. What if she’s a senior in high school,and now her prom (if she got to attend at all) pictures now have to show her pregnant for all of her life. What if the baby ends up looking exactly like the rapist, so she has to look at that for the rest of her life? What if she’s on the verge of an athletic scholorship and this will effectively end that option for her. Sorry honey, but thats how its got to be? I dont think so. Not with my child.

Its easy to take the moral position that you are taking, of saying its a baby and that trumps all else, but I ask you, are you really ready to sit down and look in a rape victims face and say, Like it or not, you WILL have this baby, by law, not because you chose to engage in the reproductive act, but because our law is so rigid you have no other option? I’m saying I can’t do that. If someone chose to have sex, then yes, I could. Encourage the rape victim to have the baby and help with everything I possibly can, absolutely. Force her to have the baby as if she’s someone who’s opinion doesn’t matter at all? Certainly not.


163 posted on 08/20/2012 1:07:26 PM PDT by SoCalTransplant (Honey badger's level of concern is negligible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Wow. Good for you. You could find work at NBC selectively editing comments.

“The President’s “view” on abortion have no EFFECT on the number of abortions.”
Okay.
“However, Obama’s views on infanticide and his support of NOW and Planned Parenthood...” (You love those ellipsis points don't you!)
Huh?!? You just said it doesn’t matter what the President believes about abortion, since there is no correlation.

Let's post what you selectively omitted!

The President's "view" on abortion have no EFFECT on the number of abortions.
However, Obama's views on infanticide and his support of NOW and Planned Parenthood pretty much guarantee that public funding will find its way from my pocket into abortions via Obamacare.

Let's review:

1. Romney's verbal opposition to abortion doesn't reduce the number of abortions, in fact, it appears to be a negative correlation.

2. Obama's support of NOW and Planned Parenthood and votes to LEGALIZE infanticide -DO- make it more likely that ALL OF US will have to pay for some portion of abortions under Obamacare.

164 posted on 08/20/2012 1:09:58 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Dont really know who Kiessling is, but see, you are terming this in how politicians feel and should answer questions. I dont really care about that. I’m not trying to make a political point here....I’m just saying that there is no way, in that case, that I would ever force a girl one way or the other. I’d encourage her to adopt or raise the child, but I can’t say you have to. She didn’t make any choice that I can point to and say “you have an obligation”. And frankly, I’d like to hear how that conversation would go down with a girl that you cared about? You’ve given all the arguments, all the talking points, all the effort you can give but she says “sorry, I just dont think I can handle having this baby”. What do you say to her? Not what did Pat Buchannan say, or what does Kiessling say that candidates say, what do you say when you look her in the face to tell her that like it or not, she’s going to give birth? How do you tell a person something like that? Its beyond me.


165 posted on 08/20/2012 1:15:45 PM PDT by SoCalTransplant (Honey badger's level of concern is negligible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

“Let’s post what you selectively omitted!”

Yes, what did I “omit”? An apples to orange comparison, which contributes nothing to the discussion. That’s why I omitted it, because it’s nothing more than a distraction.

If Romney’s views have no correlation with the number of abortions, then Obama’s views have no correlation either. That is the apples to apples comparison. Throwing in the junk about Obama supporting PP and funding for abortions is an entirely different argument. If you want to muddy the waters with that, fine, but I don’t have to take the bait.


166 posted on 08/20/2012 1:18:59 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Oh. You need arguments expressed more simply.

Let’s see.

The President’s opinions on Apples have no effect on the total number of apples in the US.

But also...

Obama likes apples, and he also thinks I should help pay to buy apples for his constituents.

Oh goody. Now it’s all apples and you can comprehend the point.

Babies are being murdered, and anything you do to get Obama reelected won’t affect the number of murders much, but it may set us all up to pay for some of the murder.


167 posted on 08/20/2012 1:35:01 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

“Oh. You need arguments expressed more simply.”

Not simply, just consistently, and without appeal to logical fallacies, please.


168 posted on 08/20/2012 1:36:41 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Name the fallacy.

(Hint: What’s the one where you ignore the actual argument, quote a completely different one, and then tear that different argument apart.)


169 posted on 08/20/2012 1:41:41 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
RE :”That's certainly what the “establishment” Republicans want you to do. They sure don't want them uppity tea party candidates getting elected.

Crackpots who throw their races for no reason are just a gift to everything they claim they oppose, liberalism.

The Angle-Reid disaster is a perfect example of helping the liberals for no reason. Maybe this guy will still pull it out but he certainly caused problems.

170 posted on 08/20/2012 1:46:30 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel

“I agree. We simply don’t know what we’re going to get with Romney”

What we do know is that he cannot be as bad as Obama. Beyond that we know little. His record is not as encouraging as his rhetoric.


171 posted on 08/20/2012 2:14:34 PM PDT by Woodsman27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

First, thanks for cutting off my comment in mid-sentence, and second, I was not making an argument in favor of abortion. I was merely hypothesizing about a possibility that since abortion is legal at this point, having a choice after being raped (no choice) actually may strengthen a woman’s resolve to do the morally right thing. Granted, that hypothesis doesn’t add much to the debate, never claimed it did.


172 posted on 08/20/2012 2:40:27 PM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Shhhh...You’ll be called an Obama voter if you tell the truth about Romney’s stance on abortion. Just say “more gruel, please” and shuffle along.


173 posted on 08/20/2012 2:49:11 PM PDT by APatientMan (Pick a side)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

That he’s consistently rated conservative no matter where he’s been, and his pro-life record is stellar.

So, the issue is being the alternative to Obama or Romney.

It could be the CP or the LP, so far as “conservatism” is concerned. The LPs are pro-choice, so that rules them out for me automatically without looking any further into their principles.

Did you support TARP?


174 posted on 08/20/2012 3:01:51 PM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

“Name the fallacy.”

Conflation.


175 posted on 08/20/2012 3:07:40 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Does abortion kill a baby?


176 posted on 08/20/2012 3:08:32 PM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Is an unborn baby a person?


177 posted on 08/20/2012 3:10:57 PM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Support for abortion after rape is overwhelmingly popular. No candidate can be elected to statewide or national office who even THINKS about questioning it.

Them's the facts, and Romney and his people presumably know it.

178 posted on 08/20/2012 3:15:57 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown are by desperate appliance relieved or not at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: APatientMan
“more gruel, please”

The ABOs doom succeeding generations. Both our parties are now big brother since ABOs have acquiesced. They have traded their blessing for a bowl of pottage.

179 posted on 08/20/2012 3:17:47 PM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: xzins

How much better for the victims of rape to go ahead and have the child and put it up for adoption. I have a dear friend whose son was born because she was raped.

She is Catholic, her son is currently a practicing non-denominationalist, but he takes care of her — giving her rides, having her for dinner, etc.

BTW, pray for this son that he may come to the fullness of belief, amen.


180 posted on 08/20/2012 3:17:47 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-291 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson