To: fr_freak
but since it is so easily hacked, as we see with the various "swatting" incidents, it should no longer be considered reliable. Either secure the system, or toss it.
Swatting is not hacking ... and just what would you replace the current system with that is so much better?
17 posted on
08/19/2012 3:01:12 PM PDT by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: oh8eleven
Swatting is not hacking
See post #16.
27 posted on
08/19/2012 3:28:00 PM PDT by
fr_freak
To: oh8eleven
>> “and just what would you replace the current system with that is so much better?” <<
.
A madatorily well armed citizenry that doesn’t need police for anything but incarcerating the perps that are apprehended by the citizens, as it was when the country was founded, and until 1833.
44 posted on
08/19/2012 4:13:56 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: oh8eleven
Swatting is not hacking
I respectfully disagree. Whether accomplished via spoofing or social engineering, it's hacking, and it's illegal.
Or, do you consider hacking a state of mind, that simply involves learning about systems and doing no wrong, in the 2600 vein? If so, then I agree, but that's not the common nomenclature. :)
55 posted on
08/19/2012 4:49:24 PM PDT by
andyk
(Go Juan Pablo!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson