Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Chandler
"If Benn drew first then he is guilty."

Ahhh not really UNLESS Benn drew without any being assaulted in some way first. But if the ex-cop pepper sprayed him that is assault. Its all down to who touched who first.

91 posted on 08/19/2012 4:36:57 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg
UNLESS Benn drew without any being assaulted in some way first. But if the ex-cop pepper sprayed him that is assault. Its all down to who touched who first.

True to a point. If Benn was getting in his face in a truly hostile manner, then the pepper spray was warranted. We don't know what happened. All we have is Benn's story, which is either true or a self-serving fabrication, and the police's story, which is either based upon witness testimony and/or video, or a fabrication.

It is far more likely that a jailed man will lie about his situation than an entire police department will, but if I were on a jury I would require evidence and testimony of the man's guilt before convicting, even though I think he's probably guilty.

In other words, distrusting the police would not be my default position, but they had better have more than just a guess about what happened. If they have no evidence or eyewitness testimony, Benn goes free.

95 posted on 08/19/2012 5:42:57 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Whatever a homosexual union might be or represent, it is not physically marital. - F.Cardinal George)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson