Ew. Do I HAVE to read shit by Andrew Sullivan? I'd rather not, if it's all the same to you. I don't think articles by Andrew Sullivan used in SUPPORT of a position fit Free Republic's guidelines, which "oppose all forms of ... homosexualism..."
I'm actually surprised that an article by Andrew Sullivan is used by a FReeper as "talking points", rather than fodder for derision.
I still find it passing strange that the best sources for freepers afflicted with Romney/Ryan Derangement Syndrome seem to be Andrew Sullivan, DU, HuffingtonPost, Salon, and other left-wing personalities and sites. Precious, *costly* bandwidth and -- much more importantly -- a hard-won premier BRAND, wasted promoting the very communism, socialism, homosexuality, and liberalism the brand was forged to fight. Still scratching my head over that one.
Oh by the way -- I am including JimRob on this post ONLY because YOU added him to your reply to me. My guess is, JR is weary with this whole issue. Running FR is a labor of love, and I have nothing but respect for what Jim has built from conviction and the sweat of his brow.
Nevertheless, facts are facts, and reality is reality, and there's a time to be silent, and a time to, well, NOT be silent.
See my tagline.
FRegards
Great tagline.
I think Andy Sullivan and Andrew Sullivan are two different people.