No, I’m not half correct. I am correct.
There is no lawful requirement for anybody to release tax returns, period. Somebody did it first and now it’s precedent, but it’s not a requirement.
You assume he has secrets to hide. If he had any secrets that mattered (unlawful tax dealings) the IRS would be all over him and they aren’t.
I’ve heard it explained that his type of tax returns are complicated, and I believe the main (valid) reason he wouldn’t want to release them is because of the way the president’s team would twist them around into “proving” some kind of crime or ethical violation. Seriously, Obama’s campaign ran an ad accusing Romney of MURDER! And you want to hand over complex tax returns that the 99% won’t understand?! Obama has a record of digging until he finds non-dirt on his opponents, then he twists it around and makes it look like dirt, and the sheeple, useful idiots buy it. It would be like handing your innocent 15 year old daughter over to a pimp who promised to “take good care of her”. Even though the literal words he speaks sound like a positive thing, he has nothing but ill intentions for your precious daughter.
It’s completely asinine to assume that he’s not turning them over because he has something to hide. He’s protecting his innocence from the evil doings of the corrupt evil doers in Obama’s campaign. And I completely respect him for it, and so should all of us. Stand up to the bullies, and make our own rules, without playing into their ridiculous games.