[betty boop]

Those cultures (Chinese, Muslims) which didn't have this foundational belief gave up on scientific advancements as futile because they had no expectation of consistency or rationality in nature.

Excellent observation, MrB!!! Thank you!

What evolutionists seem not to wish to explain is how a purely "blind, random process" can generate consistency and rationality in nature.

Another way to put the question (as Plato did): If natural phenomena are solely the products of ceaseless change (i.e., "evolution"), then how can anything ever be anything at all?

tacticalogic, allmendream: Care to take a stab at that question?

It seems the fundamental duality of the Universe consists of that which does not change, and that which is capable of changing. Evolution entirely omits the former from its mindscape....

Which is why Darwin's theory appears to be so irrational to me. FWIW.

[hosepipe]

Sister BooP you nailed it ..... YET AGAIN...
You have a “habit” of doing that...

[allmendream]

Anything using DNA is incapable of staying the same. DNA cannot replicate without error.

Is a coyote not a coyote if it has 5% wolf ancestry? It can BE just fine without fitting nicely into one neat category.

Humans want things to be clearly defined. Nature is usually not so obliging.

[Alamo-Girl]

Another way to put the question (as Plato did): If natural phenomena are solely the products of ceaseless change (i.e., "evolution"), then how can anything ever be anything at all?

Right to the heart of the matter, dearest sister in Christ, thank you!

Indeed, I aver that the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences is like God's copyright notice on the cosmos.

God's Name is I AM.