Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VanDeKoik

First off: Can not believe how many of you here coward at the thought of Her Royal Thighness.

Second: It may be a smart move for Obama but a bad one for Hillary. Why she would put her future in the hands of a loser like Obama is beyond me. Does she really want to go into an election cycle where finance and jobs are number one and she gets a month to prepare for genius boy Ryan? Does she want to govern with what looks like to me a Republican House and Senate in her way?

Third: Like Sarah I say BRING IT ON if it does happen. Let us have the chance to bury the Blamer in Chief and the entire Clintoon past!

LET’s ROLL!


74 posted on 08/16/2012 7:56:38 AM PDT by Republic Rocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Republic Rocker; Hoodat
It may be a smart move for Obama but a bad one for Hillary

Then where did Hoodat get the Obama/Clinton sign? Obviously they're already out there.

Romney needs to step down. Only one person can handle the Clinton. We had better hope Newt will forgive how he was treated in the primary.

80 posted on 08/16/2012 8:04:23 AM PDT by tsowellfan (Voting for Obama/Biden is like purposely swallowing two tapeworms)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Republic Rocker
Second: It may be a smart move for Obama but a bad one for Hillary.

UNLESS, via the Chinese mafia, something happens to Oboma. She'll be all set for the next 4 years, and then she'll be running as an incumbent in 2016.
If Oboma does throw 'ol Joe under the bus, he's seriously taking quite a gamble.

Think Marcy Park. The Clintons have an "impressive" death list behind them. They don't take prisoners.

82 posted on 08/16/2012 8:05:53 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Republic Rocker
Second: It may be a smart move for Obama but a bad one for Hillary.

If Obama wins re-election, the economy will be stagnant for the next 4 years, and the deficit will exceed $20T.

Hillary's too smart to have that albatross hanging around her neck.

86 posted on 08/16/2012 8:09:26 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Republic Rocker

I think people are always going to be a bit nervous without understanding the dynamics of a presidential race.

Hillary is in her 60s, and hasn’t run a campaign where she actually won after a tough fight.

The Senate seat in NY was gifted to her, and Obama and Co. hounded her right out of 2008 with accusations of being a racist.

Hill would never run as a 2nd banana. Clintons don’t do that. If she did, there would be tension and fissures the whole way through overwhelming any message Obama might want to project.

And top of that, the economy will still suck.


93 posted on 08/16/2012 8:19:49 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Republic Rocker

They will be good cop bad cop. Anything that Obama does that polls really bad. Hillary can take a position of opposing it.

Makes her look moderate and Obama dosen’t care he has nothing more to run for.
And then when she runs in’16 she can say she stood up to Obama as VP.
To me its a no brainer.


99 posted on 08/16/2012 8:23:46 AM PDT by tshaun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson