Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCBryan1
We reject this argument because machine guns are “dangerous and unusual weapons” that are unprotected by the Second Amendment. Dist. of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 627 (2008).

What good would a weapon that was not dangerous be? As to being unsual, almost all federal police forces, and of course the US Military, are armed with several different types of machine guns. The Texas Highway Patrol even has boats armed with M249s in shielded mounts.

They have 6 of them in fact.

More info and pictures at this link

Henry also argues that Congress did not have the power to enact § 922(o)’s prohibition against possessing machine guns pursuant to the powers delegated to Congress in the Commerce Clause. That argument fails because we already have held that the Commerce Clause authorizes § 922(o)’s machine gun possession ban.

That's even more idiotic. The Second Amendment is just that, an amendment. By the nature of amendments, they change the basic document where it conflicts with them. The use of the commerce clause, or any other part, such as the power to tax, to infringe on the right of the people protected by the second amendment is thereby forbidden.

6 posted on 08/14/2012 7:42:03 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
Also, how can the interstate commerce clause have anything to do with a device manufactured and possessed in a single state?
7 posted on 08/14/2012 7:43:36 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson