Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Justaham

I’m sorry, 1-2% does not a “bounce” make. Such light movement should be looked at as ‘statistical noise’ when it comes to virtually any poll. Now, if Romney had jumped 5-10 points, then that’s what I’d call a bounce. Really though, I don’t think I recall the VP selection ever yielding any significant movement in polls. The electorate is so polarized this year, I doubt we’ll even see much movement after the conventions, and the convention speeches normally DO create at least a temporary real bounce in the numbers. After both conventions the numbers are normally about where they were before hand, within a week or so.

Having said that, I reckon I’d rather have 0bama be down 2 than up by that amount.


18 posted on 08/14/2012 5:35:56 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KoRn

Today, it is 47-45, a week ago the numbers for Aug 2-8, the numbers were reversed. That’s a 4 point bounce.


19 posted on 08/14/2012 6:20:19 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: KoRn

They can’t even massage the data to give The Disaster a lead any more even with Registered voters. R and R have a significant lead now is what this poll shows, closer to +7 than +2.

And we don’t even know to what extent Democrats were oversampled. This could be a lead of as much as 10% in the real world.


24 posted on 08/14/2012 8:19:41 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Obama MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson