“I worked for both Presidents Reagan and Carter, as well as Generals Haig, Vessey, Ross, Kingston and others, writing reports, analysis, summaries and assisting in briefings. You are WAY off base here. Do you truly believe that Mr. Obama is better on national defense and social issues than a “President Romney” would be? If so, have your family commit you on a 72 hour hold.”
Well isn’t that lovely! And totally irrelevant. I don’t care if you once served under U.S. Grant, R.E. Lee, John J. Pershing, George Washington...et.Al. That doesn’t make you any of them....and it has no bearing on what I asked. (BTW - IF you insist on continuing to wrap yourself in a U.S. flag by quoting your “brillant” military career...we are going to have to bury you....stop it - it is immodest and sounds like a PX trooper)
Palin ONLY mentioned FISCAL CONSERVATIVES as the “Base” of the party. Why did she not mention the others? Especially the SOCONs. I want to know IF she has sold us out like the rest of the GOP establishment.
I DO question Romney’s military credentials. He was playing Mormon Missionary selling snake oil when he should have been serving in the military. Of course, Obama was being a community organizer. In my thinking a Mormon spreading a false Gospel is NO better than a community organizer spreading racial division; both are snake oil - both hurt people. Either man is ONLY as good as the military officers he surrounds himself with. I don’t know what Romney will pick as military advisors...maybe that new Lesbian general? After all, he is for homosexuals (more than Ted Kennedy!). She out to be a good advisor to him.
On Moral issues. Well, Myths record is pretty bad....just as Obama’s is. I see no gain in that arena.
So, it looks like ONLY fiscal conservatives will benefit from a Myth election.
Why else did Sarah say what she did. I am concerned and feel betrayed by her. Once again here is a direct quote from the article you posted:
“’It’s all about the independents, Shannon,’ Palin said. ‘We don’t have to just keep on preaching to the choir, there, of the hardcore base of fiscal conservatives within the Republican Party – we got ‘em; Romney’s got ‘em. We’ve got to reach the independents.’”
Sarah...what about SOCONs? What about DEFCONs? Sarah....what in the world are you saying????