Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/13/2012 12:22:45 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
Hardly anyone knows that two thirds of the warming predicted by the climate models comes from assumed changes in humidity and clouds, and only one third comes directly from the extra carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases.

Even worse than that, 2/3 of the past warming which is probably exaggerated by 2x (see Watts et al recent paper) is also supposedly due to water vapor feedback. Thus the models are supposedly "validated" using temperatures biased by urban warming. Not to mention there is no good record of deeper ocean temperatures needed to calculate heat storage.

The climate modelers do not model weather, they assume certain types of weather and input it using parameters. An assumption of constant relative humidity with increasing temperature is especially bogus since weather proves that wrong in many places every day. The models do not have a shred of a hope of predicting temperature regardless of the assumptions built into them.

2 posted on 08/13/2012 1:59:16 AM PDT by palmer (Jim, please bill me 50 cents for this completely useless post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Anyone calculate the carbon footprint of the olympics?


4 posted on 08/13/2012 5:21:36 AM PDT by wizwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The keys are they have been big money laundering for many years. That’s stealing.


5 posted on 08/13/2012 5:25:30 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson