Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kennard

The big difference is putting choice and price-based decisions in the hands of the consumer. That’s the first step in any sane cost reducing, free market solution.

A distinction apparently lost in this analysis.


5 posted on 08/12/2012 11:02:30 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr
The big difference is putting choice and price-based decisions in the hands of the consumer. That’s the first step in any sane cost reducing, free market solution.

... except for "the sick", i.e. pre-existing conditions, except for "the old" and except for "the poor". Their premium support will still be determined by the government. You can expect that millions will then vie to be treated as poor, old or sick. I fail to see the cost-reduction incentive.

6 posted on 08/12/2012 11:09:04 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson