Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Ryan's Slick Healthcare Plan
Economic Policy Journal.com ^ | Robert Wenzel

Posted on 08/12/2012 10:42:36 PM PDT by Praxeologue

Anybody who believes Paul Ryan wants the government out of healthcare is falling for a typical Paul Ryan scam. He slices, he dices, he throws up some smoke and then he brings out the mirrors---and then he brings in the government.

Ryan's plan calls for keeping medicare intact for anyone who is 55 or older, then he gets slippery with his plan. For Americans currently under 55, his plan will give them a health insurance voucher as high as $8,000 per year. Government will get to decide what insurance companies are eligible to accept the vouchers. Ryan says all the major health insurers will be approved and accept the vouchers. Guess what that means? Edge to the major insurers.

Ryan says his plan will eliminate the Independent Payment Advisory Board,aka the Death Panels, a panel of 15 experts nominated by the president to recommend policies to cut Medicare costs, which is part of Obama's Affordable Care Act. But it is just slick packaging by Ryan to claim that his program does not include a death panel. With the government approving what insurance companies are approved to accept vouchers, the government will also by necessity have to approve the minimum services and types of services the insurances companies will have to cover. In other words, Ryan's plan takes the death panel into a deeper and darker backroom. I suspect it would eventually drive out of the healthcare business all insurers that are not part of the voucher accepting crowd--just like Obamacare will do

Indeed, the Ryan plan has a lot of other bells and whistles that Obamacare has. It requires insurance companies to insure people who have pre-existing conditions (which means someone, somehow, will be paying for these added costs heaped on the insurance companies for this) Ryan's plan also has adjustments on the size of the voucher based on wealth an income. It's socialist through and through.

It's not a surprise that ABC says:

Underneath the rhetoric, however, Ryan's plan to reform Medicare -- a central part of his 2012 proposal -- bears some glaring similarities to President Obama's health care plan.

Like his Price Stability bill, Ryan flashes and dances about getting the government burden off peoples backs, but when the smoke clears, Ryan is one big government dude.

Real healthcare reform would get government out of the sector, not set up some kind of voucher system that keeps government in the middle of healthcare for the benefit of the crony healthcare industry. The Ryan plan sets up such power centers that the evil will seek to take advantage of. It would result in higher costs, poorer quality treatment and less innovation.

Ryan is a real bad operator because his slick moves will make many think he is attempting to shrink big government. He isn't. He just has a shinier suit with a slicker spiel.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: healthcare; ryanplan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: Kennard

How do you see allowing the consumer to make price based decisions and introducing price-competition into the market not decreasing cost?

Are you really a “free enterpriser” or do you not understand the basic concepts?


21 posted on 08/12/2012 11:45:31 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

So Obama is used as a threat so that we have to embrace socialism with open arms. Have you ever considered that Obama is thrilled that you know want the United States to become a socialist country?


22 posted on 08/12/2012 11:46:13 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Good grief Nick, if Ryan is a socialist, you’re a unicorn.

This is absurd.


23 posted on 08/12/2012 11:48:41 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

Here:

http://miltonfriedman.blogspot.com/


24 posted on 08/12/2012 11:53:07 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Okay, he just wants socialized medicine, he’s not a socialist. Is that okay for you? (Oh yeah, he wants some cuts in spending, but the significant cuts are always five years out)


25 posted on 08/12/2012 11:54:33 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis
Even us mean uncaring Conservatives believe in a Safety Net. We only get pissed when it turns into a Hammock and the “entitled” are eating Steak while we eat Ground Round.

As my dear late Mother always said, “you help people who CAN'T help themselves, not people who WON'T help themselves”.

My Mother's Sister lost her sight to Glaucoma back in the 40’s. Back then the only thing a Doctor could do is remove your Eyeballs if the pain was too intense. There was no treatment available as there is today, so she went Blind. She is 88 Years Old and never complains as much as all the idiot Liberals do day in and day out.

Before I was born, my Aunt was going to work sewing Garments in what many today would consider a sweat shop. Her Blindness didn't make her helpless. When the place closed down and another job was elusive, my Mother and Father had to force her to go to the Welfare Office to get help. I think she ended up getting $10 a week and she got off it six months later when she found a job doing assembly work.

My patience wears thin when able bodied people expect their Neighbors to pay their bills because life ain't fair. Well, if life was fair, Obama would be serving Bill Clinton Coffee every morning at the Whorehouse.

26 posted on 08/12/2012 11:55:11 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Republicans Hope people are Smart, but Democrats Know people are Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
How do you see allowing the consumer to make price based decisions and introducing price-competition into the market not decreasing cost?

As we discussed above, Ryan's original plan would have introduced market-based pricing that would have saved money. Ryan's March plan moved back toward a defined benefit program that appears to remove the benefits of his original defined contribution plan. My current problem is that his current proposal is too vague to reach a conclusion. It sets of my warning bells, however.

As for fighting among ourselves, if that is your concern, I can think of no better venue that FR for a free discussion, unfettered by the formal position of the Republican Party.

27 posted on 08/12/2012 11:55:39 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Look Doll, I don't have to shoot any messenger. The 'messengers' who seem happy to disseminate and spread around the sort of anti-Ryan crap this guy Wenzel is spewing are the ones doing the shooting.

Now you can use your cap letters all day and all night when you yammer away about how we must "LISTEN TO FACTS YOU DO NOT LIKE" however that does not diminish the inconvenient fact that threads like this produce tangible benefits for one candidate or another.

So ask yourself: "who benefits?"
28 posted on 08/12/2012 11:57:36 PM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

No, Nick, it’s not good enough. It’s lobbing spitballs from the sideline. Only it’s not a game anymore, it’s our country’s future.

I’m sorry, I’m not in the mood for it anymore.


29 posted on 08/12/2012 11:58:17 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kennard
True, but we cannot afford Medicare in its current form, largely because it encourages waste and inefficiency.

Do you not think that insurance companies will do a far better job of recognizing and effectively dealing with fraud, waste and inefficiency than the federal government ever could?

30 posted on 08/12/2012 11:58:33 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
I welcome debate on how fast and how far when it comes to this nation’s severe economic problems.
But rear guard action now? No. We don’t have the luxury of that debate. Now is the time to fight, to join any and all allies in the fight.


Correct. All the wannabe admirals, generals and economic/health care policy wonks are always eager to jump up and shriek about the deficiencies of this plan, that plan, or any plan. If we were all in a foxhole, those jokers would be counting how many bullets are being fired, and how many we can't afford, instead of just grabbing a g*ddamned gun and opening fire on the ENEMY.
31 posted on 08/13/2012 12:00:53 AM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

The only worthy discussion for the next three months is how to remove the current regime from power.

After that, we can discuss..


32 posted on 08/13/2012 12:04:14 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Do you not think that insurance companies will do a far better job of recognizing and effectively dealing with fraud, waste and inefficiency than the federal government ever could?

I completely agree. The government should stay out of health care as much as possible. However, that is not what Ryan's current proposal provides; his earlier proposals, yes, but not his current proposal.

Aren't we supposed to be keeping these guys' feet to the fire? I thought that was part of FR's mission in the new Romney world.

33 posted on 08/13/2012 12:05:57 AM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
So Obama is used as a threat so that we have to embrace socialism with open arms. Have you ever considered that Obama is thrilled that you now want the United States to become a socialist country?

I never said or suggested any such thing Nick. Have you ever considered that 0bama is thrilled by the never ending attacks on his adversaries by people who OUGHT to be, if not supporting the only political party with a shot at throwing the Kenyan douchebag out on his ears, at least refraining from sabotaging the effort?

We all wanted a more conservative candidate, and a more conservative ticket. We didn't get it. Now we have a choice between 0bama and his opponent, which happens to be Mitt Romney. I will say that Romney made not a good, but a superb choice in selecting Paul Ryan to be his VP candidate. It took only a few hours for the attacks on Ryan to begin, sadly by some of our own.
34 posted on 08/13/2012 12:06:13 AM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Well, someone has to stick up for this country. We have two presidential candidate who came up with the healthcare plan. Maybe you like it, but someone has to dissent. Someone has to stick up for the country.


35 posted on 08/13/2012 12:06:40 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

They are both Keynesian dbags. And you want to send the message to Romney that he can ignore that he can totally ignore conservatives? You want to tell them they should govern from the left?


36 posted on 08/13/2012 12:10:34 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I’m sorry but I don’t see your dissent as sticking up for this country. I see fighting to defeat the current regime as sticking up for this country.

It’s down to three months. Choose to fight against one or the other or sit it out.


37 posted on 08/13/2012 12:11:12 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

You’re supposed to vote for establishment candidates and then be happy that they are 0.00001% better than “the other guy!” And you, Mr. Thinky McWaitAMinute, and screwing it up.

Don’t you know that the proper time to have a discussion is after it’s too late to do anything about it?


38 posted on 08/13/2012 12:13:51 AM PDT by Domalais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; mkjessup

If Romney/Ryan beats Obama/Biden, you think the message is the left wins?

That’s, again, absurd.


39 posted on 08/13/2012 12:16:59 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

Oh, OK, I’ll be sure to vote for Obama then.


40 posted on 08/13/2012 12:19:14 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson