Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

It doesn’t actually “require” the kids to be covered to 26 does it? It requires the insurance co. to cover the child up to 26. It doesn’t require dad or mom to keep him on the policy.


14 posted on 08/09/2012 9:52:25 AM PDT by saleman (!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: saleman

Remember, Obamacare wasn’t going to “require” us to get rid of our doctors; it wasn’t going to “require” death panels; the penalty for not having insurance wasn’t a tax; the cost of insurance would go down and all other falacies that went along with it.


18 posted on 08/09/2012 9:59:37 AM PDT by AbolishCSEU (Percentage of Income in CS is inversely proportionate to Mother's parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: saleman

SOP in divorce decrees- whoever has a job and/or insurance has to keep the kid(s) on their policy.


27 posted on 08/09/2012 11:34:19 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson