Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: afraidfortherepublic

Why isn’t he challenging Obama’s legitimacy?


6 posted on 08/09/2012 4:40:47 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Venturer

The purpose of Art. II Sec. I, clause 5 was to protect the Office of POTUS from undue foreign influence, PARTICULARLY from a father owing allegiance to a foreign sovereignty. Obama is the living, breathing embodiment and personification of the reaon that the framers placed that clause into the US constitution. His epistemology and belief system is alien to our constitutional traditions and founding beliefs.

On 30 July 2012 IA US Rep. Peter King recently announced that the GOP will take up the issue of Obama’s ineligibility after the election. So if he is ineligible NOW than its ally ally oxenfree untill January? There is either a reason to investigate or their isn’t. If there is, than NOTHING is more important than exposing him and taking appropriate action. I have never beheld such political cowardice in my life. An absolute disgrace!!!


14 posted on 08/09/2012 7:23:11 AM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson