Replies

There are no lawful orders when the commander-in-chief is unlawful.

So you think my son, an E-4 in the Army, should refuse to do anything because of the above belief? If so, you are an idiot. Number one, anyone with half a brain KNOWS that position is a loser which at the very least would get him punished and probably get him kicked out of the Army. Even Sun Tsu talked about only choosing battles you can win, and that battle you suggest is a loser. Number two, even if all of the enlisted personel decided to refuse to do anything because of your belief, the end result would be our Armed Forces purged of Constitutional, right minded people. Who is going to fill those spots? The Black Pampers? Wake up and get real, dude! The responcibility for making sure Obama meets the Constitutional requirements is Congress and the Courts. Both have refused to do their duty. So now are you going to refuse to obey any laws passed by Congress or inforced through the courts because they are failing in their duty? Of course not! Don't purpose actions that you aren't ready and willing to lead.

Don’t feel too bad. On this very thread we have an active duty commissioned officer admitting that his paycheck is more important than his sworn oath to defend the Constitution.