You have fallen into two liberal traps. I will clarify the points:
a. The Constitution is the center of US Politics, not the right.
b. It’s either Obama or Romney. Period. The liberals are encouraging (and loving) this anti-Romney discourse. It smells of Jeremiah Wright’s influence.
Quite incorrect: The far right Constitutional conservatives are the only ones who pay the Constitution due deference. That does not apply as well in my case, as I am a Reagan Conservative. While the Constitution is key to me too, I see things in the broader sense of upholding the principles of all Conservative factions.
b. It’s either Obama or Romney. Period.
So the 'liberal trap' is to vote for either a liberal or a liberal. As I said upthread, the only sensible thing to do is refuse both. The advancement of the principles I support is not accomplished by voting for either, and in fact, either one will predictably be deleterious to my cause... How the hell does voting for that which is abhorrent solve anything? Doesn't it just make that which is abhorrent seem popular and lend it credence it doesn't natively possess?
No FRiend, it is you that is blinded. If one continually settles for politicians, it is little wonder why there are no statesmen. If one continually votes in that which opposes us, it is little wonder that there is no opposition to that which we abhor.
Sooner or later you will have to draw a hard line that you simply will not cross. I would encourage you to contemplate where you think that is.