Posted on 08/07/2012 3:45:40 PM PDT by greyfoxx39
Yup.
BYU.
October 2007
Reid spoke to over 4,000 on BYU campus. Here’s the FReeper story on that:
Reid Gets Warm Reception at BYU
From this article, written by the Lds church owned Deseret News: At the end of his speech, Reid earned a standing ovation from a small percentage of the crowd and applause from the rest.
But in reality I think there is a group of dedicated faux conservatives here that will do anything they can to get the muslim marxist anti-American anti-constitutionalist uber-radical community zombie into Office for 4 more years to finish off America as we know it!
But you know good luck w/ that, I’m not gonna lose sleep over that debauchery. Any other election this tactic might have worked, but not this one. The community zombie is so radically odious that we will get him defeated no matter how throughly his minions muck up their own integrity for his ugly self.
Is it true that his friends were encouraged to refer to him as Bring-em Young?
To make their argument plausible, they have to make the bogus assertion that “Romney and Obama are exactly the same.”
Sorry, but these pro-Obama folks are beyond disgusting and warped. Truly sick.
NO BODY SHIFS A GIT ABOUT ALL THIS MORMON STUFF! LEAVE IT ALONE!
IF ALL THIS IS IMPORTANT, WHERE THE HELL IS ALL THE OBAMA/MUSLIM STUFF? HE IS A MUSLIM. SELF ADMITTED. BURN THIS BASTARD FOR HIS ISLAMOFACISM. PERIOD.
Strange, your soul is secure so you do not aperently care about about anyone else.
Mononism is anti Christian. Belief in Mormonism will lead people away from
God Almighty, shouldn’t that concern you?
we’ll take the Mormon.
______________________________
Which one do you want ???
Wee Willie or Wee Weed Barry ???
Theyre both Mormons...
Agreed, but its best to ignore and/or mock them, and not get too worked up over their behavior. They are a minuscule bunch and mixed in amongst them are a lot of obama minions pretending to be anti-Mormon conservatives. These sad folks are the useful idiots to the obama gangsters to get their islamist don corleone 4 more years to f$%k America.
Agreed, but its best to ignore and/or mock them, and not get too worked up over their behavior. They are a minuscule bunch and mixed in amongst them are a lot of obama minions pretending to be anti-Mormon conservatives. These sad folks are the useful idiots to the obama gangsters to get their islamist don corleone 4 more years to f$%k America into submission.
Hopefully intelligent Freepers will give pause before they believe this woman simply because she was a strong Obama supporter long before Mitt Romney entered the picture.
Susan Emmett
retired
self employed
Q3-2008
Milwaukie, OR
$1,259 donation to barack obama
more
http://www.city-data.com/elec2/08/elec-MILWAUKIE-OR-08.html
Susan Emmett (Not employed/Retired), (Zip code: 97222) $320 to OBAMA FOR AMERICA on 03/05/08
Before any more Christians get breathless with admiration for Sue Emmett’s rant against Mormons, they should notice that she seems to despise Christians even more...
http://www.blueoregon.com/2007/06/barack_obama_an/
“Coupled with the complete hijacking of the Republican Party by the Fundamentalist Christians, we are staring down a tunnel of despair and fear. I believe the only thing that is going to put this country back to some semblance of being a “beacon of hope” for it’s own citizens (as well as the world) is a leader who has the skills to bring people together, the diversity in his background to make him credible to the world, and the intelligence to see through the manipulations that take place in Washington D.C.
That’s why I have hope in Barack Obama.”
(They are indeed political twins)
Careful re: the apologetical approaches being used by Romney supporters. They will tell you...
1. ..."It doesn't matter what Romney does or doesn't embrace."
All that matters to SOME zombie-like "All But Obama" voters (a sheer euphemism for RomneybotISM) is to...
...hype you up on fear-steroids so that THE ONLY THING that matters is who Romney is running against.
They employ, plainly speaking, pragmatic utilitarian political relativism. Pragmatic utilitarianism, simply put, reduces the socio-political to our own pet-agenda bents. Sadly, Spring/Summer of 2012 has shown how Romney "Conservatives" have tended to fall into the same type of utilitarian logic Democrats used in trying to keep President Clinton in office during his impeachment times. Some Democrats then argued that it didn't matter whether Clinton was guilty of sexualizing his employee; all that mattered was not disrupting a "good economy." Per the pragmatic utilitarians, a candidate supposedly isn't to be measured based upon true conservative principles he/she embraces (or doesn't); rather his resume' is 100% irrelevant!
"The ONLY thing that matters," they tell you, "is that Obama is wrecking the economy. (Hence: 'Tis only Romney's main opposing candidate that matters).
The end-game result? This will, of course, strongly replace the GoP with RINOISM. Permanently. To use a racetrack term, this is called "backing the wrong horse." RINOS indeed are the "blue lights" (the name for the 1813 pro-British traitors) of conservatism. They -- and grassroots Americans who have been raised to embrace free-floating relativism and utilitarianism -- are the cultural capitulators of our times!
And they are rapidly gaining new converts every day via Romney's candidacy!
Thus, Romney and Obama are the "G men" twins (Romney is six of one and Obama a half-dozen of another). What once-upon-a-time drew criticism of Romney...for example, his pioneering socialistic healthcare, has now become "acceptable" to these "born-again" Romneyites! The truth is that BOTH Obama and Romney are EACH "G men" (both government men who have pioneered socialistic healthcare).
Likewise, they will tell you...
2. ...that it "doesn't really matter what candidates believe religiously" -- that there somehow (miraculously and prophetically) won't suffer ANY bleedover to ANY other spheres of life...that religion is somehow hermetically sealed and carefully compartmentalized. Sadly, this simply caters to reinforcing one 2012 book published -- that we are indeed a "nation of heretics."
Likewise, they will tell you...
3. ... minus any evidence, mind you, that somehow one heretical religious system (Mormonism) being injected mainstream into our socio-political culture trumps yet another heretical system (Islam) -- all in the name that Obama is somehow a current Muslim (no evidence offered); or that Romney is somehow an economic political savior whom we have to trust implicitly. Never mind that hell stands eternal for all such systems that cater to counterfeit salvation (BOTH MormonISM and Islam).
Finally, they will tend to ignore...
4. ...the potential bleedover of a candidate's vulnerability -- his gullibility -- to deception. They will talk of this character defect -- this sheer lack of discernment -- as if it wasn't part of a presidential "job description!" Yet in areas such as foreign policy, a candidate easily deceived is easily subject to "hook, line, and sinker" foreign policy major fiascos!
Simply put, we must weigh a candidate's level of vulnerability to deception -- for that transcends religious considerations. (And a candidate's level to deception in the most important area of his life, his faith, is an excellent indicator of potential other gullibilities)
We all have blinders to truth. Nobody has a monopoly on it. (But I would say the Bible has the best snapshot of God & humanity and the interaction between the two). Deception exists in the world, and when compared to trustworthy sources of truth (the Bible), deception exists as a continuum. If we agreed that a candidate belongs to the most deceptive cult in the world, then certainly that candidate's vulnerability to deception in the most important area of his life--his faith--serves as an indicator that he/she might be more easily deceived in public policy issues. "Vulnerability to deception" belongs on a character checklist! Even one 2007 poll indicated that 54% of Americans would not vote for an atheist.
A similar principle revolves around this: Other-worldly commitments (faith, whether it's 'True' faith or misdirected faith, IS a character issue!)
There's no way around this realization! To try to extract such other-worldly commitments from character is simply not possible. Time & time again folks try to hermetically seal "faith" & "religion" away from the public square as if folks checked their faith at the door or as if folks were neatly cut-up pie pieces. (Just try telling any voter that he should never weigh "character" into his/her voting-decision considerations).
Good find, but probably can’t get traction with such facts here.
Watch it there comrade! Your obamabot crimson red underwear is sticking out of your baggy pants a little.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.