Replies

Got news for you. Romney is a tool alright -- the right tool to continue the job the liberals started. And if you think Republican-empowered Congress would be so limpid as to not oppose a weak, plurality-elected Obama from continuing his damage, how can you think they wouldn't roll over just as easily to Romney? Romney has an established record of advancing and promoting every single major liberal agenda, from state-run health care to activist judges to global warming regulation. You wish Republicans will "hold his feet to the fire" when he continues on the path he has ALWAYS taken -- yet you are confident they would NEVER oppose or confront a defensive, weak Obama.

You can keep posting all the Romney apologist crap about how, gosh, he really tried to stop all this gay agenda stuff, but he just kept being overridden!!! ... but the reality is that he has advanced and supported the gay agenda at every turn. It's in the legislation he was responsible for, in his words, his speeches, and on his stationery, with his signature, and in press releases sent out by his people.

LOOK AT THE MAN'S RECORD. Actions speak louder than words. His actions from the start have been those of a liberal Democrat statist. Wishing this wasn't so doesn't change a thing. ABOers claim to live in "Realville," the truth is they live in "Wishville." Folks in Realville have faced the fact that Romney is a liberal Democrat registered as a Republican, and that voting for liberals, including Romney, guarantees a bad outcome. Therefore the smartest thing to do is to vote such as to weaken whichever liberal wins.

In Wishville, though, you can just wish it away -- today. If the bastard gets elected on a landlide, you in Wishville will be wishing you never heard of Romney, let alone voted for him, because HE WOULD BETRAY YOU.

Obama was "Hope and Change." Romney is "Hope he'll Change." We know how the first one worked out.

And if you think Republican-empowered Congress would be so limpid as to not oppose a weak, plurality-elected Obama from continuing his damage, how can you think they wouldn't roll over just as easily to Romney?

So it's better for conservatism to just hand the presidency to the democrats, rather than elect a republican who would then be beholden to conservatives if he hopes to be re-elected? Sorry, but that logic escapes me.

Romney has an established record of advancing and promoting every single major liberal agenda, from state-run health care to activist judges to global warming regulation.

He was a figurehead governor, presiding over a legislature that was 80% democrat. And BTW, MA has Bill Weld to thank for advancing those special "gay" rights. Bill was admired by the dems at the state house because he was so liberal. Those same dems didn't like Romney very much.

Perhaps Romney might have ruled by executive order as Obama does, but that wouldn't have gone over very well in MA.

We know how the first one worked out.

Yes we do. We have an anti-American subversive in the White House, caught on an open mike whispering deals with the Russians. Everything else aside, at least Romney is a real American.