“Right wing terrorist” is the word used by a former Department of Homeland security analyst and federal investigators. Plus several news media have described him in similar terms and I am quoting on their authority.
Individual rights and personal property rights are guaranteed by the constitution and have nothing to do with left or right.
If you are challenging the assertion then you better have something more then mere words.
So you have appeal to authority? That’s your argument? From officials in a Leftist Administration who are all about smearing the political right, by association?
Look, logical fallacies in argumentation do not constitute an argument.
You have made an assertion that this guy was “right wing”. What were his beliefs that make him so? You are standing on naked assertion and appeal to authority at the moment, and I continue to call BS.
And further, the modern Left shows again and again they spit on various aspects of our Constitution.
You aren’t really getting this, are you?