[USS Alaska]

The radicals here on FR won’t.

Are you including the owner of this site in your assessment?

Why not?

JR is every bit as irrational about Romney as pissant was about Sarah Palin.

I'm a Catholic, that's irrational, you cannot reason your way to Jesus Christ.

You radicals that hate Romney are irrational, but that's your belief and you have every right to be wrong.

[COBOL2Java]

You radicals that hate Romney are irrational, but that's your belief and you have every right to be wrong.

Then what are you doing on America's premier conservative website? Or did you mistakenly assume that this was a Republican site?

So Jim is irrational. Nice.

[RC one]

actually, not voting for Romney is a perfectly rational decision for any real conservative. It’s the “anybody but Obama” people that are completely irrational.

[paudio]

You’re right, but as you said, when people believe in something,they wouldn’t want to hear anything different. It’s just a fact of life.

[jettester]

I don’t hate Romney, nor Obama for that matter, because as a Christian we are called to love our neighbor as ourselves. However, I hate what Obama stands for and the evilness in his motives. Romney was never my choice and I really wrestle with the concept of living with the fact that I might not vote for him - but will for the candidates with clear, concise conservative principles. I am voting as a conservative Christian - not as a Republican and until Romney convinces me that a person like me can fit in his “world” I am holding fire. But don’t accuse me of something that is not true.

[RIghtwardHo]

Back atcha.

[presently no screen name]

you cannot reason way to Jesus Christ.

You got that right! You have to BELIEVE and OBEY HIM.

How are you believing HIM when He says 'Fear NOT'

And how are you obeying HIM when you vote for a candidate who is AGAINST traditional marriage and PRO ABORTION and a KNOWN LIAR? Satan is the master of LIARS!

Guess what - you are like any other UNBELIEVER - you are like the world and basically could be an atheist for all the good you think 'you are a catholic' is going to do you with DELIBERATELY NOT LISTENING OR OBEYING!

I could give you a litany of God's Word that you are violating - but USS Alaska found a better way - doing his own thing which is a recipe for disaster.

"Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean NOT on your own understanding"

"“Be NOT wise in thine own eyes: FEAR the LORD, and DEPART from evil".

And you are drawn to evil and ANYONE that isn't YOU CALL IRRATIONAL!! How's that for the demonic?

[Timber Rattler]

You radicals that hate Romney are irrational...

Conservative radicals...now there's a thought.

[jimsin]

'You radicals that hate Romney are irrational, but that's your belief and you have every right to be wrong.'

Radical and Wacko to man, Alaska....Annie Coulter the best brain around gave the best reasons to back MITT a long time ago....repeating them to these dingys is like talkin' to the dry wall. I've got a sack of door knobs in my shed smarter than these doofusus...bwhahaahah ....

They can't seem grasp Ann's genius and practicality...or what really amounts to her Stone Common Sense....sooooo listen up small grasshoppers....as once again we take you by your handsies and 'splain to you what's goin on... ...it's called 'Gull the Indies 101'...follow along it's easy if you try..... Clearly Ann is right on target when she rightly points out……to win in November we must win over a number of Independents and Mitt scares them less than either Newt or Santorum …she intelligently makes 2 other prescient arguements… There are 2 crucial issues in this election and they are crucial because if we lose on them... the damage done to America CANNOT be undone….. this nation will be changed forever. The question IS as ANN clearly points out.... which candidate has the best stance on both of these 2 issues. And the question also is which candidate scares indepenents less making it possible to get their votes and thus to get a conservative into office in the first place. ON each of the 2 critical issues Mitt clearly has the best stances he also has the best chance of culling indepedents in numbers large enough get him elected..... The 2 issues are: 1. OBAMACARE…if OBAMACARE is allowed to continue forth people will get more and more used to some of the ‘treats’ it contains…...as that happens Obamacare will not be able to be overturned and AMERICA WILL FOREVER BE CONDEMNED TO FOLLOW A SOCIALIST PATH……therefore it is crucial that we elect the man most likely to deep six obamacare….CLEARLY THAT MAN IS MITT ROMNEY.. On Mitt’s website he pledges, on his first day in office to write immediate Obamacare waivers. They will be extended to each of the 50 states thereby rendering it inert. Then he pledges to work for Obamacare's complete repeal. 2nd CRUCIAL ISSUE 2. Immigration ….if amnesty in any form goes forth its just a matter of time before America becomes CALIFORNIA. Amnesty is SOMETHING THAT CANNOT BE UNDONE AND WILL FOREVER CHANGE AMERICA… if it is adopted…. HERE MITT'S STANCE is AGAIN CLEARLY THE BEST ONE... MITT'S stance?.....NO AMNESTY...... illegals here are ousted and must apply for citizenship according to extant immigration laws....psssst thats not rocket science folks... (Newt has some mixed up red card guest worker scheme that will fade into general amnesty soon after it’s clumsyness is initiated) Finally, many fear that Mitt waivers on some things and that he is not as conservative as they would like.....but Ann points out that Mitt listens and shows willingness to be influenced and after November, when we have captured both houses of congress...it will be not a difficult thing to bring him around to conplete conservative compliance.

[EternalVigilance]

You radicals that hate Romney are irrational

It's hard to find a Romney supporter who doesn't hate Romney, or one who agrees with much of any part of his public record.

And you call us "irrational"?

LOL...that's an eleven on an irony scale of ten.

[SoConPubbie]

JR is every bit as irrational about Romney as pissant was about Sarah Palin.

Hey, if you're going to bad-mouth someone, at least have the courage to ping them and not talk behind their back.

[Finny]

You're very far out in left field if you think that hate has anything to do with many of our rejection of Romney, and you're absolutely irrational if you think Romney is anything but a liberal Democrat registered as a Republican. Either that, or you have never seriously considered his record.

We HAVE, and it is because of his RECORD, not because of "hate," that we reject him.

The irrational folks are the ones who are ignoring every instinct in their bones that is telling them Romney stinks, and voting for a stone-cold liberal original author of ObamaCare anyway out of sheer fear of a skinny America-hating fraud.

[itsahoot]

You radicals that hate Romney are irrational, but that's your belief and you have every right to be wrong.

On the othe hand we might be right, uo have no empirical evidence to the contrary. The only thing you have is the Obama boogyman to bring fear into the equation, not rationality. I have voted for exactly on president in m life, Ronald Reagan, all th other votes have been against te other more evil guy. This vote eill be a loser, but I will vote for Palin.

“Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.”

-- John Quincy Adams

"Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that he is not making a present or a compliment to please an individual--or at least that he ought not so to do; but that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society

for which he is accountable to God and his country."

-- Samuel Adams