Reagan wasn’t conservative enough for who? Only RINOs seem to think we have forgotten who gave Reagan all the trouble.
The only ones trashing Reagan are the RINOs like socialist Romney and his liberal dad and some liberaltarians, who hate anyone that holds the socially conservative beliefs Reagan held. It is these same RINOs and liberaltarians who love Romney so much. They don’t care that he’s pro gay, and instituted both socialist medicine with $50.00 abortions and gay marriage in Massachusetts. They don’t even seem to care that he lies about everything and has no problem confiscating your tax dollars, known as fees, and spreading the wealth — especially to the green community and welfare recipients. Winning is all that matters to them and as Romney believes, you don’t need principles to do that.
It’s your socialist Romney who doesn’t want to go back to Reagan/Bush. Do you feel the same way?
No, remember how conservatives kept saying during the Reagan years “let Reagan be Reagan” because he moved to the left on some issues, and his Supreme Court picks were underwhelming.
Hey, I'd have voted for Gingrich, for Santorum, for Perry, for Cain, for Bachmann -- none of them are perfect conservatives by a long shot, but as Reagain said, if you agree with the candidate 75 or 80 percent, take that beauty and run.
I don't agree with Romney even 15 percent; the more I look at his record, the more I study the actions of his political career, the more I realize that there is no purism, there is no refusal to compromise, going on. The plain fact is that Romney is a liberal Democrat registered as a Republican.
It is the most despicable form of sophistry for Romney apologists to even compare a conservative's refusal to vote for Romney to an imaginary "Well, even Reagan wouldn't satisfy you!"
The red flags are high and glaring that Romney is a very, very bad thing to happen to the Republican party indeed. And he would be equally bad for America.